Trump's mass firings were illegal, judge says, but it's too late to reverse them
The mass firing of thousands of government employees earlier this year was unlawful, a federal judge ruled this weekend, but it’s too late to do much about it.
In a ruling that showcases the challenge the judiciary faces in reining in the fast-moving Trump administration, U.S. District Judge William Alsup stopped short of ordering a reinstatement of employees because “too much water has now passed under the bridge” since their termination.

“The terminated probationary employees have moved on with their lives and found new jobs. Many would no longer be willing or able to return to their posts. The agencies in question have also transformed in the intervening months by new executive priorities and sweeping reorganization,” he wrote in a decision that sharply criticized the growing use of the Supreme Court’s shadow docket.
Instead of requiring the employees be reinstated, Alsup ordered the federal government to update its personnel files to reflect that the firing of 25,406 employees was unrelated to performance and to send letters to each of the affected employees saying, “You were not terminated on the basis of your personal performance.”
Alsup in March ordered the employees to be reinstated because the firings were arbitrary, but the Supreme Court quickly overruled the decision because the groups that brought the lawsuit lacked legal standing. By the time the issue came back to Judge Alsup with the Supreme Court’s issues addressed, it was too late, he said.
“But the Supreme Court has made clear enough by way of its emergency docket that it will overrule judicially granted relief respecting hirings and firings within the executive, not just in this case but in others. And, too much water has now passed under the bridge since the Supreme Court stayed this Court’s preliminary injunction reinstating probationary employees,” he wrote.
-ABC News' Peter Charalambous





