Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial updates: Defense closes; deliberations set for Monday

The prosecution’s summation put Sean Combs squarely atop an alleged criminal enterprise that the government said relied on an inner circle of “loyal lieutenants."

“Those lieutenants were especially loyal. They were armed and ready,” prosecutor Christy Slavik alleged.

Numerous assistants she called “foot soldiers” also operated within the enterprise, according to Slavik: “They were young. They didn’t blink an eye.”

Each member of the inner circle was paid by Combs’ business, Slavik told the jury. “He was the boss of every member of his inner circle, and he was in charge. Over and over, the defendant and his inner circle agreed to commit crimes together,” Slavik said.

Prosecutors say those alleged crimes included an agreement to distribute drugs, as well as kidnapping, arson, bribery, sex trafficking, obtaining labor by force and threats, arranging travel for the purposes of commercial sex, and helping Combs cover up other alleged crimes.

To find Combs guilty of racketeering, the jury must unanimously find he and another member of the alleged conspiracy agreed that two crimes would be committed.

“Here, though, you have far more than two acts,” Slavik said, telling the jury that there were “hundreds” of drug distribution offenses alone that would be enough to convict on the racketeering conspiracy charge.

“Drugs -- an essential ingredient of every 'freak-off,' the way the defendant kept Cassie and 'Jane' awake and engaged,” Slavik said.

She pointed to testimony from the former assistant known as "Mia," who also appeared under a pseudonym, who told the jury that Combs made her choose from an array of three powders. Slavik also noted testimony from Brendan Paul, a former Combs assistant who testified under immunity and told the jury that Combs allegedly made him try tusi, a powdery mix of drugs dyed pink, to see if it was good. Paul also testified that he sought reimbursement for “personal Gucci items” that were really hard drugs.

“It doesn’t matter that the quantities were small and fit inside his Gucci pouch,” Slavik said. “The defendant and his staff were all involved in distributing drugs.”

Sean Combs, clad in khakis and a light-colored sweater, placed a hand over his heart as he entered the courtroom this morning, looking at his twin daughters who appeared in the family row for the first time since early in the trial.

The family and the jury heard a federal prosecutor deliver a closing statement that called Combs “the leader of a criminal enterprise” who “doesn’t take no for an answer.”

The prosecutor, Christy Slavik, said Combs “forced and manipulated Cassie Ventura and 'Jane' to have sex with escorts for his own entertainment,” thinking he was above the law until the trial exposed his crimes.

“The defendant used power, violence and fear to get what he wanted,” Slavik said, speaking from a podium directly in front of the jury box and with the aid of digital slides.

Slavik sought to link two distinct episodes, eight years apart and with two different women, to cast Combs as a serial sex trafficker.

The first alleged episode occurred in 2016 at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles. “During a 'freak-off' with Cassie and an escort, the defendant got violent with Cassie,” Slavik said, referring to former Combs girlfriend Cassie Ventura. “You saw what happened. The defendant threw her to the ground. He dragged her back to the 'freak-off.'”

The second alleged episode occurred in 2024 at "Jane’s" house, where Combs “kicked, choked and slapped 'Jane,'” Slavik said, referring to another former Combs girlfriend who testified under a pseudonym. “She couldn’t get away. He dragged her back to the house by her hair and then he forced her into a 'freak-off.'”

Combs is the only defendant in the case but the prosecutor told the jury he did not act alone.

“He managed to do this for two decades because he used his money, his influence and his inner circle to cover up his crimes,” Slavik said. “It’s his kingdom. Everyone was there to serve him.”

After more than six weeks of emotional, often graphic testimony about sex, drugs and violence, federal prosecutors on Thursday are set to summarize their case against Sean "Diddy" Combs, trying to convince a jury of eight men and four women, ages 30 to 74, that one of hip-hop’s most acclaimed figures coerced women into drug-fueled sexual marathons with male escorts.

Prosecutors also allege that Combs used an inner circle of advisers, assistants, bodyguards and other employees to carry out a pattern of criminal activity.

While the prosecution has pruned some of the alleged crimes that underpin the racketeering conspiracy charge – no longer pursuing attempted kidnapping or attempted arson as acts in Combs’ alleged liability – the arson of rapper Kid Cudi’s car is still included as a predicate act, with prosecutors arguing it arose out of jealousy when Cudi started dating Combs' girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense has countered that there’s no direct evidence linking Combs to the arson.

In their closing argument, currently scheduled to begin Friday morning, defense attorneys are expected to deny Combs led the sprawling criminal conspiracy that prosecutors allege. They’re also expected to argue that his sexual partners were not victims of sex trafficking who were coerced into taking part, but were willing participants and girlfriends who stayed with Combs for years.

Christy Slavik will deliver the government’s closing statement, which is expected to last about four hours.

Marc Agnifilo will deliver the defense summation. He is expected to speak to the jury for about three hours, after which the prosecution will have the opportunity to deliver a rebuttal.

The charge conference concluded Wednesday night after numerous adjustments to the language of the instructions the judge will give to the jury before they begin deliberations.

Some of the changes involved legal concepts and necessitated adding or subtracting sentences. Other tweaks, like making sure the word “government” is not capitalized in the written version of the instructions, could be accomplished with a simple “find and replace” function, defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro said.

At the outset of the conference, Judge Arun Subramanian noted, "This is the most people I’ve seen at a charging conference."

Sean Combs sat through a portion of it with his shoes off, his stocking feet visible beneath the defense table.

Subramanian will read the jury instructions once each side completes closing arguments on Friday.

The prosecution's closing arguments are expected to last about four hours. Closing arguments for the defense are expected to last about three hours. The prosecution’s rebuttal is expected to take about an hour.

The judge adjusted the schedule of closings at the request of the defense.

“We would prefer to start early on Friday morning,” Shapiro said, adding that the defense was concerned the jury could be sleepy in the afternoon.

Prosecutor Maurene Comey objected, saying the request appeared to be "gamesmanship more than anything else." She also noted the upcoming July 4 holiday, which the defense had previously cited as a concern.

The judge agreed to the defense adjustment.

Prosecutor Christy Slavik will deliver her closing statement Thursday. Court will then adjourn for the day.

Defense attorney Mark Agnifilo will deliver his closing on Friday, followed by the government rebuttal and the judge’s charge.

It's unclear whether there would be time for the jury to begin deliberations late Friday or whether deliberations will start Monday.