Prosecution refutes defense's characterization of so-called "freak offs" and Combs' generosity
In the government's rebuttal, prosecutor Maurene Comey denounced the defense summation for insinuating the women "wanted it," telling the jury it defied logic to think Cassie Ventura wanted certain explicit elements of so-called "freak offs."
"What we're talking about is being in dark hotel room, awake for days, covered in oil, often with a UTI, in heels, with your pelvic area sore…having sex for hours, including with strangers," Comey said. "The defense wanted you to believe Cassie and 'Jane' wanted that. That's ridiculous on its face."
Comey also argued sex tapes that the defense said depicted "date nights" with "beautiful rooms" and "nice music" were not visual representations of beautiful evenings but repetitive sessions for one man's enjoyment. "It's the same performance," Comey said.
Comey told the jury that in order to convict Combs of sex trafficking, they only needed to find there was one so-called "freak off" when Combs knew he was using force, fraud or coercion to gain Ventura or "Jane's" compliance in the event.
After the defense argued the career opportunities Combs afforded Ventura and the rent he paid for "Jane" were evidence of generosity, not leverage, Comey insisted it was the opposite.
"The money, the career, the house, were all tools the defendant used to control Cassie and Jane," Comey said. "It trapped them."





