Defense concludes dramatic cross-examination of Ventura friend; judge issues Combs warning
After the defense accused Bryana Bongolan of lying about Combs allegedly dangling her over a balcony in Los Angeles, contending that Combs wasn't even in California at the time Bongolan said the alleged incident occurred, she testified on re-direct examination that she has “no doubt” it occurred but does not know exactly when.
Bongolan used hand gestures to demonstrate for the jury how she said Sean Combs lifted her onto the railing of the balcony of Cassie Ventura’s 17th-floor apartment.
“Where did his hands go?” prosecutor Madison Smyser asked.
“Down this way,” Bongolan testified, moving her hands.
“So were they on your breasts?” Smyser asked. Bongolan affirmed in her testimony that they were.

Bongolan also testified on re-direct that she wore the neck brace the jury saw in a photo on more than one occasion.
“Why did your neck hurt?” Smyser asked.
“Because I got slammed into the furniture,” Bongolan testified. “By Puff.”
Bongolan conceded that she doesn't know exactly when the alleged incident occurred, telling the court “because it was a while ago.”
Asked for a second time whether she had any doubt “that Mr. Combs held you up on a 17th-floor balcony,” Bongolan testified in answer, “I have no doubt.”
On re-cross, defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland said Bongolan’s testimony was motivated by money.
“You’re suing Mr. Combs because it’s your opportunity to become a millionaire,” Westmoreland said.
“I can’t agree with that,” Bongolan testified.
“You’re seeking $10 million, isn’t that true?” Westmoreland asked.
“I’m seeking whatever the judge finds is correct,” Bongolan testified.
“It means a lot to you to become a millionaire?” Westmoreland asked.
“No ma’am,” Bongolan told the court.
Bryana Bongolan’s testimony has concluded. The court is now in a brief lunch break.
During the break and without the jury present, Judge Arun Subramanian threatened to expel Sean Combs from the courtroom if he makes facial expressions during testimony.
“I was very clear there were not to be any facial expressions,” Subramanian told lead defense counsel Marc Agnifilo. “There’s a line of questioning where your client was nodding vigorously and looking at the jury and there was a subsequent moment when there was a sidebar and I saw your client looking at the jury.”
Subramanian added emphatically, “That is absolutely unacceptable.”
He then asked Agnifilo: “Will it happen again?”
Agnifilo said it would not.
“If it happens again, if it happens even once, I will hear an application from the government to give a curative instruction to the jury, which you don’t want,” Subramanian said, also declaring that an additional violation “could result in the exclusion of your client from the courtroom.”
He instructed Agnifilo to talk with Combs, telling the attorney “there should be no efforts whatsoever to have interaction with this jury."




