Judge rules certain details around 2024 "behind closed doors" event must remain undisclosed
The private meeting in the judge’s robing room before testimony began today involved a January 2024 event that defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said “took place behind closed doors in a hotel room but there were other people there.”
Agnifilo spoke obliquely about it because Judge Arun Subramanian appears to have ruled that certain details must remain undisclosed as part of his order allowing the prosecution witness "Jane" to testify under pseudonym.
Agnifilo argued for full disclosure.
“Part of the reason that trials are fully public is so if other people realize they know something about an event discussed in a public courtroom they can come forward and share their recollection about it,” Agnifilo said. “That is kind of the practical side to the constitutional right to a public trial. It’s public for a reason.”
Prosecutor Maurene Comey countered that sufficient information about "Jane" and the undisclosed event in question has been revealed. Disclosing more, she said, is a “pretense to attempt to harass and intimidate this witness.”
Judge Subramanian agreed with Comey.
“The idea that somehow public revelation of details we discuss would result in some kind of investigation that would impact on the charges raised is not a real concern,” the judge said.
Ninety minutes after court was supposed to begin, "Jane" has returned to the witness stand to continue her cross-examination.




