During testimony, Cassie Ventura called them “freak-offs.” Combs’ ex-girlfriend known by the pseudonym "Jane" called them “hotel nights.” Combs' assistants knew them as “wild king nights.”

However they're referenced, those sex encounters are evidence of sex trafficking because Combs used force, threats, fraud and coercion to compel Ventura and "Jane" to participate, prosecutor Christy Slavik told the jury during the government’s closing argument.

“The charge is about the defendant’s use of illegal actions to get Cassie and 'Jane' to say yes,” Slavik said. “This is not an attempt to criminalize dysfunctional relationships or unconventional sexual conduct.”

The defense has argued that Ventura and "Jane" were not victims of sex trafficking, but long-term girlfriends who willingly participated in Combs’ “polyamorous” lifestyle.

Slavik told the eight men and four women in the jury box that they do not need to find that all the "freak-offs" were the products of force, fraud or coercion.

“You only need to find the elements of sex trafficking are met on one occasion,” she said. “So, if there was one time, one single 'freak-off,' when the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that Cassie or 'Jane'" was participating because of his lies, his threats or his violence, that’s it.”

The jury was shown a collage of male escorts with whom prosecutors said Ventura and "Jane" were made to have sex in a “slow progression from masturbating and touching to oral sex to intercourse,” often multiple times over multiple nights.

“They were done when the defendant said they were done and not any sooner than that,” Slavik said.

The bribery predicate is satisfied by two episodes that followed the beating of Cassie Ventura captured on 2016 surveillance video taken at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, prosecutors said in their closing statement.

First, hotel security guard Israel Florez testified that Combs tried to hand him a stack of money.

“The defendant handing a fistful of cash to officer Florez was his first attempt at a bribe that day,” prosecutor Christy Slavik said. “He knew what he had done and he knew the consequences."

Secondly, hotel security guard Eddy Garcia testified that Combs promised to “take care” of him in exchange for the video footage. When Combs learned Garcia’s boss was willing to sell the video, Garcia testified that Combs called him “Eddy my angel.”

Garcia testified that Combs ran $100,000 in cash through a bill counter in $10,000 increments.

“The bribe is now complete,” Slavik said during her summation. “He bought the evidence."

Defense lawyers have previously argued that while Combs may have engaged in domestic violence and led an unconventional sex life, he didn’t commit a crime.

The government’s summation turned to a second predicate act of the alleged racketeering conspiracy: kidnapping.

Prosecutor Christy Slavik reminded jurors about former Combs girlfriend Cassie Ventura’s testimony, in which she told the jury Combs stomped on her face while she was curled up on the floor of an SUV, leaving her battered and bruised. Ventura testified Combs made her go to a hotel so no one would see her injuries.

“The defendant made her go to the hotel and stay there for about a week,” Slavik said. “The defendant told her she couldn’t leave.”

Slavik told the jury Ventura had seen guns in Combs’ home, had heard him make threats and understood that he was capable of violence.

“The defendant had instilled reasonable fear,” Slavik said. “This is kidnapping.”

Prosecutors said former assistant Capricorn Clark was also a victim of kidnapping. She had been holding expensive jewelry that went missing.

Clark testified that one of Combs’ bodyguards, Uncle Paulie, took her to an empty building under construction, the future headquarters of Bad Boy, and made her take lie detector tests for five straight days to attempt to find out what happened to the jewelry. If she failed the tests, Clark testified, the test administrator told her, “They’re going to throw you in the East River.”

“You know she didn’t consent to this,” Slavik said. “But what choice did she have?”

Slavik also asserted that jurors had seen ample evidence of the arson predicate act.

“The defendant had Kid Cudi’s car set on fire,” Slavik said.

The defense has suggested there is no direct link between the arson and Combs but the prosecutor said, “the evidence and basic logic suggest otherwise.”

Slavik said there is no reasonable doubt Combs used his enterprise to have Cudi's car firebombed out of jealousy after learning that the rapper had begun dating Ventura.

“He literally said he was going to blow up Kid Cudi’s car,” Slavik said. “The only person with any motive who was powerful enough and vicious enough to light another man’s car on fire. And you know why he did it: Cassie.”

The prosecution’s summation put Sean Combs squarely atop an alleged criminal enterprise that the government said relied on an inner circle of “loyal lieutenants."

“Those lieutenants were especially loyal. They were armed and ready,” prosecutor Christy Slavik alleged.

Numerous assistants she called “foot soldiers” also operated within the enterprise, according to Slavik: “They were young. They didn’t blink an eye.”

Each member of the inner circle was paid by Combs’ business, Slavik told the jury. “He was the boss of every member of his inner circle, and he was in charge. Over and over, the defendant and his inner circle agreed to commit crimes together,” Slavik said.

Prosecutors say those alleged crimes included an agreement to distribute drugs, as well as kidnapping, arson, bribery, sex trafficking, obtaining labor by force and threats, arranging travel for the purposes of commercial sex, and helping Combs cover up other alleged crimes.

To find Combs guilty of racketeering, the jury must unanimously find he and another member of the alleged conspiracy agreed that two crimes would be committed.

“Here, though, you have far more than two acts,” Slavik said, telling the jury that there were “hundreds” of drug distribution offenses alone that would be enough to convict on the racketeering conspiracy charge.

“Drugs -- an essential ingredient of every 'freak-off,' the way the defendant kept Cassie and 'Jane' awake and engaged,” Slavik said.

She pointed to testimony from the former assistant known as "Mia," who also appeared under a pseudonym, who told the jury that Combs made her choose from an array of three powders. Slavik also noted testimony from Brendan Paul, a former Combs assistant who testified under immunity and told the jury that Combs allegedly made him try tusi, a powdery mix of drugs dyed pink, to see if it was good. Paul also testified that he sought reimbursement for “personal Gucci items” that were really hard drugs.

“It doesn’t matter that the quantities were small and fit inside his Gucci pouch,” Slavik said. “The defendant and his staff were all involved in distributing drugs.”